Article Summary: VanLehn (2011) Tutoring Systems

Motivation: Compare the effectiveness of human and computer tutors

Definitions:

  • Computer Tutoring Systems
    • Intelligent tutoring – step-based or substep-based, students work problems in the system and receive feedback for each step, high interactivity
    • Answer-based tutoring (Computer-Aided Instruction (CAI), Computer-Based Training (CBT), Computer-Aided Learning (CAL)) – answer-based, students work problems outside of the system and enter the answer to receive feedback, low interactivity
  • Human Tutoring – students work on problems with subject-matter experts synchronously, high interactivity

Continue reading

Article Summary: Durso et al. (2014) Human Factors – Oxford Bibliography

Motivation: Create an annotated bibliography of Human Factors that introduces and organizes its sub-fields and seminal works.

Outline: Human Factors is a field of psychology that examines how humans interact with technology, so we organized this bibliography around the factors that affect this interaction. After a general overview of the field and its methods, we introduce psychological factors from sources both internal, in “Perceptual and Cognitive Factors,” and external, in “Organizational and Social Factors.” Next, we discuss how to apply these factors to designing systems that match the capabilities and limitations of humans both cognitively, in “Cognitive Factors in Design,” and physically, in “Physical Factors in Design.” Finally, we describe factors that affect users once they start interacting with a system in “Deployment Factors.” Continue reading

Article Summary: Posner (2011) Proficiency-Based Assessment

Motivation: Most STEM courses use summative assessment almost exclusively, and this practice fails to foster student learning and engagement. To improve learning outcomes, we need to develop, test, and implement formative assessment practices.

Intervention: This study uses a proficiency-based assessment tool for statistics education in which students can resubmit assignments to demonstrate successful achievement of learning outcomes. The tool gives scores of either Mastery, Proficient, Developing, or Not Submitted. Continue reading